|
 |
|
 |
| |
| vai al forum |
|
PONTIFICIO
ATENEO S. ANSELMO
St Benedict challenges
modern civilisation
to ask itself what it is for
Roma -
21 Novembre 2006.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams has
said that modern civilisation needs to discover a
proper sense of the values of time, authority and
participation if it is to renew its sense of purpose
and enable communities to cope with modern pressures.
In a lecture delivered in St Anselmo, a Benedictine
institution in Rome, Dr Williams drew from the 6th
Century Rule of St Benedict to illustrate how societies
might consider how they served a common purpose.
“What the Rule distinctively does is (at least) two things. It
asks what the rhythm of life is that will best set human beings free to advance
towards the joy for which they are made, how the priority of praise may be
embodied in a responsible adult common life that is fully located in the material
world. And it asks what the style of authority is that will enable ‘faith
beyond resentment’.”
He said that modern life, particularly in the West,
was sometimes lived as though only two things mattered:
“ …we live in a climate where both work and leisure seem to be
pervasively misunderstood; where both appear regularly in inhuman and obsessive
forms. Time is an undifferentiated continuum in which we either work
or consume. Work follows no daily or even weekly rhythms but is a twenty-four
hour business, sporadically interrupted by what is often a very hectic form
of play. It seems we are either producing or being entertained by a vast
industry that purports to guess our wants before we ask and leaves us in so
many ways passive.”
The focus on economic stability, he said, left an
important question unanswered:
“We have to ask what it is that economics sustains – its own business
or an environment of human development, intelligence and awareness? … The
pressing issue is how we sustain a civilisation capable of asking itself questions
about its purpose and its integrity; only a civilisation that can do this will
generate people – citizens – who can turn away from individual
instinct and self-protection, whether in adoration of God or in compassion
for the needy, because they know what sort of beings they are, mortal, interdependent,
created out of love and for love.”
A civilisation asking questions about authority could
learn from the way in which the Rule of St Benedict
both defended those in authority and provided a voice
for those being governed:
“There is a clear and unambiguous assumption that there is such a thing
as a common good and that therefore each distinct diverse perspective is open
to challenge; that is what obedience is about. But there is an equally
unambiguous refusal of any sort of competitive struggle for the dominance of
one individual or group, and a set of checks and balances to offset any risk
attaching to the strong emphasis on the abbot’s authority.”
Addressing the question of authority in the global
economic context would require a change of approach:
“… it is hard to deny that economic powerlessness of the kind that
rapidly and insensitively enforced globalisation breeds may be fertile ground
for destructive behaviour – for the self-destructive spirals of collapsing
or failing societies, brutalised and deprived of civil dignity, as well as
for the frustration that feeds terrorism. These are not automatic processes,
of course, and the role of plain political despotism and corruption in disadvantaged
economies cannot be ignored. But when there is intense pressure to open
up struggling markets and remove subsidies prematurely or pressure to comply
with requirements by international financial bodies that strike at the availability
of essential goods, this has its part in the crippling of emergent societies
and can undermine advances towards accountable and just government.”
A civilisation which took a more Benedictine approach
to authority would develop the ability to deal more
[stability] with distinct minorities within it and
would not, for instance, be panicked by issues around
immigration. Losing the fear of alien cultures would
provide a proper basis for engagement and participation:
“Good governance and government is always about an engagement with the
other that is neither static confrontation nor competition but the production
of some sort of common language and vision that could not have been defined
in advance of the encounter.”
Participation would be possible for minority communities
without the fear of marginalisation:
“The migrant group that is prepared to work within the civic framework
of a host society, that aspires simply to citizenship, is one whose voice in
the community overall is of significance alongside those who have a longer
history and a political or economic advantage. Once within the relationships
of purposeful common life, the facts of coming from ethnically or religiously
different backgrounds should not disenfranchise them.”
Whilst it didn’t provide a direct political
blueprint for modern governance, he said, the Rule
of St Benedict had serious and challenging questions
about a society’s need for self-examination:
“ … what we can reasonably ask, in the light of the Rule, is that
political order should recognise that it cannot survive without space for some
exploration of what human identity is. A modern or postmodern society
is unlikely, for good or ill, to be overtly committed to a single ideology;
but this does not mean that it will not covertly promote this or that picture
of human distinctiveness by the way it arranges its business and governance.”
Religion, he said, could not therefore be sidelined:
“A laisser-faire reduction to market principles is not neutral in regard
to human self-understanding. And a programmatic insistence that religious
conviction be relegated to the private sphere reduces the exploration of human
identity and awareness to the level of a faintly embarrassing leisure pursuit
best kept out of sight as far as possible.” |
Visita
dell'Arcivescovo di Cantorbury _____________
Aula I
Pontificio Ateneo S.Anselmo
21 novembre 2006
ore 17.00
Download
the text |
Per
informazioni rivolgersi a:
Ufficio Relazioni Pubbliche
Pontificio Ateneo s. Anselmo
Piazza Cavalieri di Malta,
5 00153 - Roma
tel./fax: +39 06 57 91 410
ufficiostampa@santanselmo.org |
|
I |
|
|